Egypt, Arab Rep. - Household Income Expenditure and Consumption Survey 2012-13
Reference ID | EGY_2012_HIECS_v01_M |
Year | 2012 - 2013 |
Country | Egypt, Arab Rep. |
Producer(s) | Central Agency for Public Mobilization and Statistics (CAPMAS) - Egypt, Arab Rep. Government |
Sponsor(s) | Egypt, Arab Rep. Government - GovEGY - Funded the study |
Collection(s) |
Created on
Jan 05, 2017
Last modified
Jan 05, 2017
Page views
157588
- poverty-lines_englis
h - REC01_english
- REC02_english
- REC03_english
- REC04_english
- REC06_english
- REC07_english
- REC08_english
- REC09_english
- REC10_english
- REC11_english
- REC12_english
- REC13_english
- REC14_english
- REC15_english
- REC16_english
- REC17_english
- REC18_english
- REC19_english
- REC20_english
- REC21_english
- REC22_english
- REC23_english
- REC24_english
- REC25_english
- REC26_english
- REC27_english
- REC28_english
- REC29_english
- REC30_english
- REC31_english
- REC32_english
- REC33_english
- REC34_english
- REC35_english
- REC46_english
- Weight_english
Governate
(GOV)
File: REC01_english
File: REC01_english
Overview
Type:
Discrete Format: numeric Width: 2 Decimals: 0 Range: 1-35 | Valid cases: 7528 Invalid: 0 |
Value | Category | Cases | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Cairo | 820 | 10.9% |
2 | Alexandria | 431 | 5.7% |
3 | Port-Said | 66 | 0.9% |
4 | Suez | 52 | 0.7% |
11 | Domiyat | 124 | 1.6% |
12 | Dakahliya | 569 | 7.6% |
13 | Sharkiya | 567 | 7.5% |
14 | Kaliobiya | 461 | 6.1% |
15 | Kafr-elsheikh | 268 | 3.6% |
16 | Gharbiya | 426 | 5.7% |
17 | Menofiya | 332 | 4.4% |
18 | Behira | 495 | 6.6% |
19 | Ismailia | 102 | 1.4% |
21 | Giza | 648 | 8.6% |
22 | Bni-souef | 220 | 2.9% |
23 | Fayoum | 260 | 3.5% |
24 | Menia | 415 | 5.5% |
25 | Assyout | 328 | 4.4% |
26 | Souhag | 368 | 4.9% |
27 | Quena | 233 | 3.1% |
28 | Asswan | 126 | 1.7% |
29 | Luxor | 93 | 1.2% |
31 | Red-sea | 21 | 0.3% |
32 | Wasi-gedid | 20 | 0.3% |
33 | Matrouh | 30 | 0.4% |
34 | N. Sinae | 41 | 0.5% |
35 | S. Sinae | 12 | 0.2% |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.